Home | Join | About Us | Contact Us | Archives | School IPM | Site Index | Related Pages | Search  

  IPM Institute > Newsletter  > Volume 7, Issue No. 2
 

 

IPM Institute News: IPM in the Marketplace
May 2006                                                                        Volume 7 Issue No. 2
 


Contents 
 
I.    IPM Pro
fessionals Honored at Fifth National IPM Symposium

II.   EPA Strategic Ag Initiative Documents IPM Impacts

III.  IPM Modules a Click Away 

IV.  Fifth National IPM Symposium Session Material Now Available


I.  IPM Professionals Honored at Fifth National IPM Symposium

What do IPM adoption measures, goats, fruit-fly attractants, school IPM tactics and the Healthy Grown potato label all have in common? All were among the credits earning recognition under the first National IPM Achievement Award.

The first honorees, drawn from 25 nominations from four countries, received their awards during this year’s Fifth National IPM Symposium:

Glades Crop Care, Inc. 
Glades provides consulting for high value and minor crop growers in the Southeastern United States and Caribbean Basin. Based on innovative research on tough-to-manage pepper pests such as weevils and thrips, Glades developed a sophisticated program of pheromone trapping, biological control using parasites and predators, plant host manipulation and low-impact insecticides. Glades emphasizes IPM adoption and pesticide toxicity measurement, “rating” its growers and programs along the IPM continuum from basic to advanced. Glades’ services go a step beyond the norm; its consulting is accompanied by a food safety audit to ensure comprehensive field- to-consumer protection.

Hawaii Area-Wide Fruit Fly Integrated Pest Management Program
For the last few decades, Hawaii has been plagued by four fruit fly species costing the agriculture industry billions of dollars. This collaboration of federal, state and university scientists has developed a system of field sanitation, biological controls and lures to quell the problem. One of the largest producers on Oahu, Aloun Farms, saw crop losses from melon fly drop from 22 to 1% in one year. The approach was applied on over 200 small farms in 2004 and continues to grow each year.

Integrated Pest Management Program, City and County of San Francisco
Don’t be surprised if you see goats or weed-flamers on county property in San Francisco. These unique IPM practices are being used as part of an unusual and aggressive approach involving an annual workshop featuring regional and national experts, monthly “technical advisory meetings” among city agency staff responsible for pest management, and systematic ranking and selection of pesticide options for minimal impacts. In 2005 San Francisco hired and trained a small fleet of bicycle messengers to treat 20,000 catchment basins with a biopesticide for West Nile virus-carrying mosquitoes. These ground-breaking tactics have produced big results; total pesticide use in the city and county has decreased by more than 70% since the program’s inception. One of the first in California, the effort has been a model for government agencies nationwide.

Dr. Marc Lame
Over ten years ago Dr. Marc Lame convinced the Monroe County Community School Corporation (MCCSC) to test a new behavior-change based approach to implementing school IPM. Soon after, MCCSC achieved a 90% reduction in pesticide application and a 90% drop in pest complaints. This approach, dubbed the “Monroe Model” has been transferred to other school districts nationwide, with similar success. Due to the work of Dr. Lame and the team he has assembled, more than one million school children are exposed to fewer pests and pesticides. Dr. Lame’s book, A Worm in the Teacher’s Apple, chronicles his successes and obstacles while moving IPM forward in school environments. Lame hopes his book will foster public demand for IPM in schools and other arenas as well.

Wisconsin Potato and Vegetable Growers Association
Wisconsin’s potato industry has been recognized nationwide for its dedication to IPM thanks to the Healthy Grown brand developed by the Wisconsin Potato and Vegetable Growers Association in collaboration with the World Wildlife Fund and the University of Wisconsin-Madison. These partners established an independent certifying organization,
Protected Harvest, that maintains standards for the brand. Ten percent of WI farmers now participate in the program, resulting in an average 64% reduction in pesticide toxicity, which is measured using a unique indexing system. Overall, there has been a 30% increase of ‘biointensive’ IPM adoption among participating farmers over the last five years. Rather than simply applying monitoring, sampling and thresholds, biointensive IPM emphasizes the ecological basis for managing pests, resolving questions such as, “Why is the pest there?” “Why aren’t natural enemies providing adequate control?” “What system changes need to be made to maintain populations below threshold, without chemical intervention?”


II.  EPA Strategic Ag Initiative Documents IPM Impacts

Small for-profit businesses and minor crop growers sometimes have difficulty finding funding for IPM development. Tom and Anna Peerbolt of Peerbolt Crop Management, a consulting company working with caneberry producers and others, found the EPA SAI grants program to be “one of the few sources of funding for a... business like ours that helps test and implement our efforts.”

With the funds, the Peerbolts sent trained scouts to twelve growers on a weekly basis to focus on transitioning those growers to lower risk pesticides.

Since 2004, SAI programs have helped implement IPM strategies on over 780,000 acres of farmland, reducing the use of the most highly toxic pesticides by 30%.

SAI has undoubtedly affected even more acres, but prior to 2004, there was no efficient way to track impacts. In a partnership with American Farmland Trust, a national nonprofit devoted to preserving working farmland, EPA created the SAI Project Report Database, part of the SAI Toolbox. Grantees, SAI project officers and EPA managers use the database to document such things as number of acres affected by a project, pesticide use and toxicity changes, and the project’s economic viability.

According to Jim Jones, director of EPA's Office of Pesticide Programs, this is the first time an EPA non-enforcement unit has quantified the impacts of a targeted grant program. The database has made the EPA SAI a leader in a multi-agency effort to coordinate improvements in outcome reporting. Members of the National Integrated Pest Management Interagency Group will meet in June 2006 to discuss how this resource can be used best by outside agencies, said Regina Langton, an SAI coordinator.

“Without [SAI’s] work on this,” said James VanKirk, director of the Southern Region IPM Center, “I suspect the impetus for this effort would have long since dissipated.”

In addition to implementing IPM and reducing pesticide use, SAI projects help growers cut cut pesticide costs. One Massachusetts cranberry producer saved $81,000 after a 2002 SAI grant helped reduce herbicide costs. This grant funded flooding for parasitic weed control, covering 1,400 acres, the largest acreage of cranberry production in southeastern Massachusetts.

SAI grants help many non-profit organizations as well. Recently, Red Tomato, a nonprofit marketing organization that promotes local, sustainable family farms to consumers and trade buyers, was granted partial support for its Eco-Apple project. “Eco Apples” must be grown to a rigorous IPM standard and growers must keep records of IPM practices and pesticide use. The Eco-Apple project is a collaboration that includes growers, crop consultants and land-grant scientists. The IPM Institute serves as the certifier, maintaining the performance standards and coordinating on-farm inspections.


III.  IPM Modules a Click Away

The University of Nebraska-Lincoln has improved its online IPM Learning Modules for schools. The new modules load more quickly, thanks to a new flash format.

Module topics include asthma triggers, landscape pests, site-specific IPM techniques, and a new “treatment strategies” module.


IV.  Fifth National IPM Symposium Session Material Now Available

If you were unable to attend the Fifth National IPM Symposium or would like more information on a presentation or session, visit the Symposium website for abstracts, author contact information, and a number of viewable presentations.


The IPM Institute 
needs YOU!

Join the non-profit Institute and help increase IPM awareness and adoption!

Related Pages:

 

More about the IPM Institute of North America, Inc.

 

 

This site maintained by the IPM Institute of North America, Inc.
Contact us.
©Copyright 1999-2000 The IPM Institute of North America, Inc.
Last modified: November 03, 2008
Home | Join | About Us | Contact Us | Archives | Events | School IPM | IPM Eco-Labels  
SearchIPM Standards for Schools | Other Sensitive Environments  
School IPM Links & ResourcesFAQ | Applications